Final Conclusions & Further Reading
Science fiction has long served as a pathway to scientific curiosity; it engages audiences with imaginative portrayals of futuristic technology, space exploration and other-worldly experiences. But how well do these films adhere to real science? Is science fiction truly science, or does Hollywood often choose fiction over fact?
​
In this website, we have explored themes of space travel, black holes, and special relativity, analysing how different films handle the portrayal of these complex scientific concepts. We found that, while some films prioritise scientific accuracy, others take creative liberties to enhance their storytelling abilities. Despite this, one thing is clear to us: the relationship between science and cinema is a dynamic one, and one which evolves alongside our understanding of physics.
Final Conclusions
How Has Scientific Accuracy Changed Over Time?
The scientific accuracy of sci-fi films is very often influenced by the knowledge available at the time of their creation. As scientific theories develop and our understanding becomes more widespread, so too do cinematic depictions.
​
Take 2001: A Space Odyssey (1968) - one of the earliest films to prioritize realism in space travel. Director Stanley Kubrick and writer Arthur C. Clarke consulted with numerous scientists to ensure an accurate portrayal of weightlessness, artificial gravity, and spaceflight manoeuvres and physics. However, some elements, such as the depiction of artificial gravity in stationary environments, still contained inaccuracies.
​
By contrast, Interstellar (2014) had access to modern physics research and theory, including the expertise of theoretical physicist Kip Thorne at their disposal; this allowed for an unprecedentedly realistic depiction of black holes, gravitational time dilation, and space travel mechanics. In addition to this, the film's depiction of Gargantua was not only scientifically accurate – it even contributed to real research on lensing!
​
But does this mean films produced a long time ago should be judged harshly for inaccuracies? We don’t think so; we believe a film’s accuracy should be evaluated within the context of when it was made. Early sci-fi films of course lacked the scientific understanding and computational power required to produce such extravagant visualisations of black holes or relativistic effects accurately. Given this, we think movies such as 2001: A Space Odyssey were remarkably forward-thinking for their era.
Should Sci-fi Always Be Accurate?
Scientific accuracy undoubtedly enhances the realism of a film, but it is not always a top priority for filmmakers; the core reasoning behind science-fiction is just that – fiction. It is about storytelling, not modern scientific literature, and some creative liberties, such as Star Trek’s warp drive or Interstellar’s tesseract sequence, are necessary to produce the narrative impact the producers intend.
​
That said, scientifically accurate depictions are often still cinematic and can be engaging; Interstellar is a concrete example of this, where the attention to scientific accuracy of the film adds to its credibility and depth.
​
In addition to this, science fiction very often inspires real scientific research; technologies such as touchscreens, AI, and space travel were all once sci-fi fantasies which have since become a reality, and a fundamental part of the modern world. By pushing scientific boundaries and utilising creative licensing, films can inspire scientific curiosity, encouraging new generations to explore further.
Our Final Verdict: Science or Fiction?
We think both. Sci-fi is a blend of real physics and speculation. Some films strive for accuracy, and others use scientific concepts simply as a springboard for fantastical storytelling. What we think matters most is whether a film’s depiction aligns with the scientific knowledge the producers had available at the time – older movies should not be dismissed for inaccuracies, just as modern films should be praised for integrating modern understanding. Ultimately, we think the best sci-fi films strike a balance between scientific credibility and captivating storytelling – those which leave us on the edge of our seats asking “is that really possible?”, “how do they do that”, and most importantly, “what if?”.
Further Reading
Space Travel
1. The Slingshot Effect, R. C. Johnson
​
2. History of Artificial Gravity, G. Clement et al
​
4. The Maths that made Voyager possible, BBC News Science and Environment
​
5. A historical review of the theory of gravity‑assists in the pre‑spacefight era, R. Negri
Black Holes
1. Gravitational waves, Vox Science (2016)
​
2. Laser Interferometer Gravitational Observatory (2025)
​
3. Event Horizon Telescope, NASA (2024).
​